Chamomile Posted April 7, 2011 Share Posted April 7, 2011 [url="http://www.phatmass.com/phorum/index.php?showtopic=111771"]Please help me![/url] I thought maybe if I titled my topic something different then I might get some answers. There has to be someone on here who knows.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cappie Posted April 9, 2011 Share Posted April 9, 2011 Actually, if one were to look at the history, one would note that Liturgical renewal began before Pope Pius XII. Take a look at Sacrosanctum Concilium, the VII document on the liturgy. They explain why they are calling for a change. [url="http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19631204_sacrosanctum-concilium_en.html"]http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19631204_sacrosanctum-concilium_en.html[/url] Please take note that VaticanII itself didn't actually change the liturgy. What it did was call for a reform of the liturgy, and that occurred several years after the close of the council. The Council did not call for the Mass to be completely in the vernacular, BUT the Pope, using his proper authority, allowed the expansion to a vernacular Mass. Neither the pope nor the council, however, called for nuns or others in leotards leaping about the sanctuary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now