Jump to content
An Old School Catholic Message Board

Vatican Ii- Good Or Bad For The Church?


C Martel

Recommended Posts

Do you think the changes of Vatican II were overall good for the Church or have they caused harm to the Church? I think there are good arguments to both sides but I'm going to go with harm to the Church.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KnightofChrist

Vatican II is good seen through the eyes of Tradition, but seen as a super dogma a from zero starting point very very bad (as would any council). Vatican II good, the 'spirit of Vatican II' bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was needed and timely, unfortunately it wasn't used in the best way, so it became divisive. It is still seen that way, as a divide that Catholics have to be on one side of or the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='dUSt' timestamp='1283390538' post='2166718']
Vatican II was good for the church.

The misimplementation of Vatican II was bad for the church. Yes, I just now made that word up.
[/quote]


Misimplementation- I like it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AccountDeleted

[quote name='dUSt' timestamp='1283390538' post='2166718']
Vatican II was good for the church.

The misimplementation of Vatican II was bad for the church. Yes, I just now made that word up.
[/quote]


What dUSt says...... :like:



The Holy Father (when he was Prefect for the Doctrine of the Faith) has spoken about Vat II on many occasions, and this is basically how he feels too...... he also talked about how there is always a time of upheaval after a council.

Read
'God and the World' by Peter Seewald (interview with Cardinal Ratzinger)
'Salt of the Earth: The Church at the End of the Millenium' ' by Peter Seewald (interview with Cardinal Ratzinger)
'Exclusive Interview on the State of the Church' by Vittoria Messori (interview with Cardinal Ratzinger)
'Ratzinger Report 'by Vittoria Messori (interview with Cardinal Ratzinger)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good for the Church, in many ways. Imperfect implementation? Yes, and not really to be wondered at.

BTW, The Word Nerd approves of 'misimplementation' as a neologism. Anyone care to translate it into Latin?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='cmotherofpirl' timestamp='1283392809' post='2166729']
Every council brings 40-50 years of grief as things get sorted out.
[/quote]

She's seen most of them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ThePenciledOne

Ultimately it was good for the Church.

Of course new councils are going to have a rough start, since obviously those that conduct the new practices and traditions are not perfect either. So, I have to say it was great for the Church.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

un.privileged

I think, if understood correctly, it is good for the Church. My problem with Vatican II is not of its teachings. It's its ambiguity, that creates a split between indifferentists and schismatic traditionalists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...