Apotheoun Posted June 14, 2010 Share Posted June 14, 2010 The Hobbit is not a very long book, so to make it into two movies will either require adding a lot of fluff or moving the story at a snails pace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Red Posted June 14, 2010 Share Posted June 14, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sistersintigo Posted June 15, 2010 Share Posted June 15, 2010 [quote name='Lounge Daddy' date='10 June 2010 - 09:33 PM' timestamp='1276216424' post='2127021'] The more the complexities and the problems happen with the Hobbit movie, the more I am not so excited to see the train-wreck of a film that might result. From Peter Jackson not doing it, to him being involved (as a producer, not as a director), to threats from the Tolkien estate warning not to use material outside of The Hobbit (mostly, not to use The Silmarillion), and etc. [/quote] This must be how somebody plans to score two films out of one not-so-long storybook: with the Silmarillion tie-in. There is not a great deal about hobbits in the Silmarillion, as the other books kind of do as much as you can do with hobbits and hobbit/Halfling society. So I suppose the connection is about the treasure trove. Not just the all-important Ring, but the knives and swords and weapons, the magical treasures from the men of Westernesse/Numenor, whose Atlantis-like rise and fall is included in the Silmarillion chronicles (a lot about Sauron in there). Gandalf is not even fleshed out that much in the Silmarillion although you do discover his roots, you discover how he began before he was a thousands-year-old mendicant kind of wandering wizard. From there, Gandalf wisely retreats to the background, which is one way to explain how he survives the Silmarillion in one piece -- by adapting, and keeping his head down. I think the production people ought to humble themselves and accede to the Tolkien estate's wishes, just let the Silmarillion alone and let The Hobbit be The Hobbit already. And all those terrific dwarves (no, the Silmarillion doesn't much add to the dwarves' history either). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lounge Daddy Posted June 19, 2010 Author Share Posted June 19, 2010 Here are some pics of the Hobbit homes. They are sitting there, waiting to be used in a film. ... [url="http://scifiwire.com/2010/06/11-photos-from-the-set-of.php"]Sad. So very sad[/url]. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Izod Foldger Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 [quote name='Apotheoun' date='14 June 2010 - 03:42 PM' timestamp='1276540970' post='2128643'] The Hobbit is not a very long book, so to make it into two movies will either require adding a lot of fluff or moving the story at a snails pace. [/quote] Fluff being extra long battle scenes...like Transformers 2. Maybe Megan Fox could even show up too, just for added screen-time and box-office appeal. It's unfortunate about Del Toro, though; his [i]Pan's Labrynth[/i] was an amazing film, and the two Hellboy films were good as well, so he seemed like a good choice to direct The Hobbit films. Of course, [i]Apocalypse Now[/i] was a train-wreck of a film in the making, but it turned out to be one of the greatest war films ever made. So hopefully they'll still be able to come out with a good product. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winchester Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 [quote name='Izod Foldger' date='23 June 2010 - 04:30 AM' timestamp='1277281813' post='2133180'] ...[/quote] Who is [i]this [/i]guy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Izod Foldger Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 Eric. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winchester Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 [quote name='Izod Foldger' date='23 June 2010 - 07:24 PM' timestamp='1277335458' post='2133405'] Eric. [/quote] The Red? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Izod Foldger Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 No, The White. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winchester Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 You're not making any sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Izod Foldger Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 I'm caucasian. Thus, I am neither an Indian nor a Viking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winchester Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 That's crazy talk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HisChildForever Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Izod Foldger Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 Well if you would like to continue believing I am one of those, then I shan't be the one to stop you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winchester Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 I thought caucasians were a warlike people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now