Indwelling Trinity Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 [quote name='Nihil Obstat' date='11 March 2010 - 05:40 PM' timestamp='1268343627' post='2071212'] That would be you, ma'am. [/quote] Laughing this is beginning to sound like a John Wayne movie! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihil Obstat Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 [quote name='Indwelling Trinity' date='11 March 2010 - 03:49 PM' timestamp='1268344183' post='2071224'] Laughing this is beginning to sound like a John Wayne movie! [/quote] Whoa, take'er easy there, Pilgrim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tridenteen Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 JMJ You should see what he's like in ladies' rest area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihil Obstat Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 [quote name='Tridenteen' date='11 March 2010 - 05:07 PM' timestamp='1268348825' post='2071301'] JMJ You should see what he's like in ladies' rest area. [/quote] If a man can't be a man even in the laddies' rest area, where can he be?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hilde Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 You know what would be ironic? This thread being resurrected in 6 months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nihil Obstat Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 [quote name='Hilde' date='11 March 2010 - 05:11 PM' timestamp='1268349062' post='2071306'] You know what would be ironic? This thread being resurrected in 6 months. [/quote] If you remind me, I'll do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vee Posted March 12, 2010 Share Posted March 12, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tridenteen Posted March 12, 2010 Share Posted March 12, 2010 [quote name='Nihil Obstat' date='11 March 2010 - 06:19 PM' timestamp='1268349586' post='2071323'] If you remind me, I'll do it. [/quote] JMJ Ironic isn't my cup of tea, but I will remind you anyways Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmaD2006 Posted March 12, 2010 Share Posted March 12, 2010 [quote name='Hilde' date='11 March 2010 - 07:11 PM' timestamp='1268349062' post='2071306'] You know what would be ironic? This thread being resurrected in 6 months. [/quote] Well, if old posts keep coming up I will resurrect it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laetitia crucis Posted March 12, 2010 Share Posted March 12, 2010 [quote name='cmariadiaz' date='11 March 2010 - 09:27 PM' timestamp='1268357252' post='2071425'] Well, if old posts keep coming up I will resurrect it [/quote] I thank you a million times over already!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hroswitha1943 Posted March 12, 2010 Share Posted March 12, 2010 [quote name='HisChild' date='10 March 2010 - 10:35 AM' timestamp='1268231759' post='2070301'] Not quite sure where to place this post, so I thought to start a new thread. Recently there has been a resurrection, if you will, of old posts. These posts often are not weeks old but YEARS old. Some will also respond to perhaps something a poster might have said, but on closer inspection that phatmass member hasn't been on any of the boards in years as well. It's actually quite confusing (and to be honest, annoying) to attempt to follow an old conversation when members are no longer active, links don't work, articles are no longer accurate due to updated information, etc.... and then realize the post is from 2006, for example. In the spirit of charity, if you are perusing the old posts either on vocation station or elsewhere, could you PLEASE be mindful of how old the thread is, and if the person you're addressing is still on here? It would also be incredibly helpful of the first person who's posting on an old thread to clue us in on that fact, as we usually are not in the habit of looking at the dates of the original post when clicking on a thread. I've seen some feelings hurt by these old posts as well as tempers flared by simple misunderstandings because of these posts and thought to post about the heart of the issue in order to resolve the tension caused over the past week or two. Should the members who have been doing so choose NOT to do this, as no one has to listen to me of course... fellow phatmassers, if you could be mindful of the new posts on the board. If something suddenly shows up with multiple responses, rather than automatically assume a topic has been busy while you've been away, it might be a good idea to look at when the thread was started to nip uncharitable posts in the bud instead of some of the biting responses we're reading. Have a peaceful rest of the week and a blessed second half of Lent. [/quote] I just skip posts I'mnot interested in. No harm, no foul. ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osapientia Posted March 12, 2010 Share Posted March 12, 2010 [quote name='Hilde' date='11 March 2010 - 07:11 PM' timestamp='1268349062' post='2071306'] You know what would be ironic? This thread being resurrected in 6 months. [/quote] Now THAT would be funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now