Resurrexi Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 The crusades were an excellent political strategy on the part of the reforming popes. What could be a better way to keep Christians from fighting among themselves than to send them off to fight a common, non-Christian enemy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winchester Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 An enemy that had taken to killing unarmed pilgrims. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aalpha1989 Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 [quote name='Resurrexi' date='28 January 2010 - 09:06 PM' timestamp='1264730791' post='2046875'] The crusades were an excellent political strategy on the part of the reforming popes. What could be a better way to keep Christians from fighting among themselves than to send them off to fight a common, non-Christian enemy? [/quote] I agree with your first post on this thread, but not this one. If the crusades were simply a distraction technique they were in no way justified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winchester Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 They were for survival. The muslims weren't sitting around making pies and nesting dolls when the vicious Christians set upon them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resurrexi Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 (edited) [quote name='aalpha1989' date='28 January 2010 - 09:17 PM' timestamp='1264731421' post='2046884'] I agree with your first post on this thread, but not this one. If the crusades were simply a distraction technique they were in no way justified. [/quote] I never said that the crusades were just a distraction technique; however, that was definitely one of the many benefits of the crusades. Edited January 29, 2010 by Resurrexi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King's Rook's Pawn Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 (edited) That history is very complicated. It was a thousand years of back-and-forth with all kinds of conflicting political influences and agendas. I will not say that the Crusades were a noble and glorious endeavor, but the Crusaders weren't just "the bad guys" opposed to the Turkish "good guys." Edited January 29, 2010 by King's Rook's Pawn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BG45 Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 And if one wishes a more secular line of thought on a benefit of the Crusades...trade, exchange of knowledge, a drive to explore the rest of the world, etc. Muslim doctors were the best in the world at that time, and Christians learned a great deal of new medical techniques from them. Some of the more advanced of the semi-basic mathematics came from the Middle East to Europe during and following the Crusades. Items like silks and spices showed Europe that were were new things to see beyond its own borders, new things to experience. Also the crusaders themselves upon returning home, would fill their neighbors and family with stories of what they had experienced, which couldn't have hurt to instill a sense of wonder at what lay beyond in the rest of the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmotherofpirl Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 Good reads on the topic: God's Battalions: The Case for the Crusades (Hardcover) The Lost History of Christianity: The Thousand-Year Golden Age of the Church in the Middle East, Africa, and Asia--and How It Died (Hardcover) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resurrexi Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 [quote name='cmotherofpirl' date='28 January 2010 - 10:51 PM' timestamp='1264737065' post='2046973'] Good reads on the topic: God's Battalions: The Case for the Crusades (Hardcover) [/quote] Great book. I've read about half so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatherineM Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 I think it is silly to put modern ideals and morals on people living 1000 years ago. Their culture was different, their ideas of right and wrong were different and who are we to judge how they lived their lives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resurrexi Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 [quote name='CatherineM' date='28 January 2010 - 11:18 PM' timestamp='1264738715' post='2047020'] I think it is silly to put modern ideals and morals on people living 1000 years ago. Their culture was different, their ideas of right and wrong were different and who are we to judge how they lived their lives. [/quote] My ideas of right and wrong aren't at all different from those of Medieval scholastic theologians (or at least I hope they aren't). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatherineM Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 [quote name='Resurrexi' date='28 January 2010 - 10:19 PM' timestamp='1264738795' post='2047024'] My ideas of right and wrong aren't at all different from those of Medieval scholastic theologians (or at least I hope they aren't). [/quote] I'm not talking about the big stuff, but a million little things. Their ideas of nutrition, health care, hygiene, etc. I wasn't thinking about right and wrong as in killing or stealing, but as in the right and wrong way to do things in everyday life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chestertonian Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 (edited) In general, religion has a much better track record than the absence of religion does (Stalin, Pot, Mao....). Read "The Victory of Reason" by Rodney Stark. Edited January 29, 2010 by Chestertonian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesus_lol Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 [quote name='Resurrexi' date='28 January 2010 - 05:56 PM' timestamp='1264730180' post='2046861'] By fighting in the crusades, many man were able to deny themselves, take up their cross, and follow Christ. [/quote] many were also given license to rape and murder in the name of a higher power. ends and means? [quote name='Resurrexi' date='28 January 2010 - 06:06 PM' timestamp='1264730791' post='2046875'] The crusades were an excellent political strategy on the part of the reforming popes. What could be a better way to keep Christians from fighting among themselves than to send them off to fight a common, non-Christian enemy? [/quote] except for the last one where everyone ignored the pope and attacked and burned/looted another christian city for political and monetary gain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veridicus Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 [quote name='Jesus_lol' date='28 January 2010 - 11:10 PM' timestamp='1264741850' post='2047077'] many were also given license to rape and murder in the name of a higher power. ends and means? [/quote] I don't remember the papal bull legitimizing rape or murder? Perhaps you could quote that for me. And killing in war is not necessarily illicit killing. [quote name='Jesus_lol' date='28 January 2010 - 11:10 PM' timestamp='1264741850' post='2047077'] except for the last one where everyone ignored the pope and attacked and burned/looted another christian city for political and monetary gain. [/quote] That was actually the 4th Crusade where Constantinople was sacked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now