goldenchild17 Posted February 5, 2010 Author Share Posted February 5, 2010 [quote name='Veridicus' date='04 February 2010 - 11:13 PM' timestamp='1265346812' post='2051525'] I'm not convince you can kill the guy for the key. Once you have the key it could maybe possibly be permissible to turn the machine off (a la hysterectomy type moral scenario). So do the Ends justify the [i][b]means to the[/b][/i] means? [/quote] Yeah I don't think its justifiable to kill him for the key, even if he is the cause of it (although I'm leaning towards incorporating an innocent third-party victim as the host of the key.) However, there is no other way to get to the key. The key is inherently linked with the life of the victim (whether it be the guilty party, or an innocent party). So its either (1) kill him (or the innocent victim, I haven't decided yet) and save all of humanity. (2) Let him live and fulfill his plan and kill all of humanity. (3) Let him live, but shut down the whole system which will prevent the weapon from detonating, but also shut down the technology which is making our world run (and will result in the unintentional deaths of many many people if shut down). I'm rambling, probably doesn't make any sense thanks though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veridicus Posted February 5, 2010 Share Posted February 5, 2010 [quote name='goldenchild17' date='04 February 2010 - 11:22 PM' timestamp='1265347371' post='2051528'] Yeah I don't think its justifiable to kill him for the key, even if he is the cause of it (although I'm leaning towards incorporating an innocent third-party victim as the host of the key.) However, there is no other way to get to the key. The key is inherently linked with the life of the victim (whether it be the guilty party, or an innocent party). So its either (1) kill him (or the innocent victim, I haven't decided yet) and save all of humanity. (2) Let him live and fulfill his plan and kill all of humanity. (3) Let him live, but shut down the whole system which will prevent the weapon from detonating, but also shut down the technology which is making our world run (and will result in the unintentional deaths of many many people if shut down). I'm rambling, probably doesn't make any sense thanks though. [/quote] Its okay. Its an interesting query. I think option 3 has potential for being a moral outlet. I would use the Vulcan Nerve Pinch to render unconscious the Guilty Party/Innocent 3rd-Party person. You should work that in somehow.m Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goldenchild17 Posted February 5, 2010 Author Share Posted February 5, 2010 [quote name='Veridicus' date='04 February 2010 - 11:30 PM' timestamp='1265347816' post='2051532'] Its okay. Its an interesting query. I think option 3 has potential for being a moral outlet. I would use the Vulcan Nerve Pinch to render unconscious the Guilty Party/Innocent 3rd-Party person. You should work that in somehow.m [/quote] yes option 3 is where I'm going with all of it. I was just exploring the other possibilities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slappo Posted February 5, 2010 Share Posted February 5, 2010 It would be morally permissible to destroy the key to prevent the destruction of the entire human race even if some die in consequence to this action. It would not be morally permissible to kill someone to destroy the key, but it would be morally permissible to restrain/detain them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now