txdinghysailor Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 Were people in Catholic Europe 500 years ago holier than most people living in a "Western Judeo-Christian society" now? My mom says yes, I say no. I say human nature doesn't change. She says that people paid more attention to their Faith and let it influence them more back then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincent Vega Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 No. People did then everything that people do now, they just weren't as talkative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anomaly Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 [quote name='txdinghysailor' date='22 December 2009 - 12:14 PM' timestamp='1261498498' post='2024389'] Were people in Catholic Europe 500 years ago holier than most people living in a "Western Judeo-Christian society" now? My mom says yes, I say no. I say human nature doesn't change. She says that people paid more attention to their Faith and let it influence them more back then. [/quote]And what depravity, suffering, or institutionalized suffering was avoided back then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatherineM Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 Public executions for petty crimes comes to mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudate_Dominum Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 I speculate that people were generally more devout and moral in Europe of 500 years ago. Sure, human nature doesn't change, but it is possible to have a culture that is more conducive to spirituality and holiness, and a society that does not promote and/or tolerate sin as much as another. It does not seem illogical to suppose that people living in a society would be, generally speaking, of a superior moral and spiritual character. Sure, you could find plenty of sin, even some pretty major structures of sin in the society, but overall I think mine is a reasonable opinion. I think it is similar in principle to a question such as, are the students of Christendom College generally more 'holy' than the students at [insert some playboy party college]? This doesn't mean that there are no sinners at the former college, and no saints at the latter college, but in terms of inferring a generalization an affirmative answer makes sense. But ultimately I do not know; just saying my gross and uneducated opinion. What I am really curious about is why you are asking. What's the deal bro? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaime Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 You should listen to your mom. From just a technology standpoint, people have much more opportunities to sin today than 500 years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
txdinghysailor Posted December 22, 2009 Author Share Posted December 22, 2009 [quote name='Laudate_Dominum' date='22 December 2009 - 12:30 PM' timestamp='1261499426' post='2024408'] What I am really curious about is why you are asking. What's the deal bro? [/quote] Well last night we got into an argument regarding the numbers that are thrown around in our circle of friends regarding Aztec human sacrifices, the number of Aztecs converted in the 1400-1500s and stuff like that. I said that you can't assume that the numbers are perfectly accurate, because the people writing the numbers probably had something to gain by exaggerating things in their favor. And then my mom said that people were holier back then so they wouldn't. And I just find that hard to believe. So yeah, that's why I'm asking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudate_Dominum Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 [quote name='txdinghysailor' date='22 December 2009 - 11:36 AM' timestamp='1261499762' post='2024413'] Well last night we got into an argument regarding the numbers that are thrown around in our circle of friends regarding Aztec human sacrifices, the number of Aztecs converted in the 1400-1500s and stuff like that. I said that you can't assume that the numbers are perfectly accurate, because the people writing the numbers probably had something to gain by exaggerating things in their favor. And then my mom said that people were holier back then so they wouldn't. And I just find that hard to believe. So yeah, that's why I'm asking. [/quote] Oh okay, that's different. I would actually be inclined to agree with you on that one. The vast majority of people living in Europe 500 years ago were simple folks, most likely rural families and the like, and that informed my conclusion about people being holier. The institutions, the elite minorities and the militant explorer type people represent a different type of culture and I considered them to be statistically insignificant in generalizing the character of all European people. I know that a lot of the European accounts of the New World business have been exposed as biased in different ways so your suspicions are not unfounded. For example, to this day children are often taught epic lies about Pizarro's conquest of the Inca so I hear ya. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winchester Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 It used to be that sin was considered sin and shameful, even as it was committed. Now it's simply justified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resurrexi Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 [quote name='Laudate_Dominum' date='22 December 2009 - 11:30 AM' timestamp='1261499426' post='2024408'] I speculate that people were generally more devout and moral in Europe of 500 years ago. Sure, human nature doesn't change, but it is possible to have a culture that is more conducive to spirituality and holiness, and a society that does not promote and/or tolerate sin as much as another. It does not seem illogical to suppose that people living in a society would be, generally speaking, of a superior moral and spiritual character. [/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kamiller42 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 This question sounds very similar to a question I asked in faith formation, "Is there more or less evil in the world today than in the past?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimR-OCDS Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 No people weren't more holy 500 years ago. They belonged to the Catholic Church mostly because they were forced to. It was economic suicide to be outside the Church, and when the King mandated what religion his country would follow, so did the people, without question. This is not holiness, but out of such harsh times, God brought forth, very holy people. Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Socrates Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 [quote name='txdinghysailor' date='22 December 2009 - 11:14 AM' timestamp='1261498498' post='2024389'] Were people in Catholic Europe 500 years ago holier than most people living in a "Western Judeo-Christian society" now? My mom says yes, I say no. I say human nature doesn't change. She says that people paid more attention to their Faith and let it influence them more back then. [/quote] Only God can provide a certain answer to this question, since God alone has access to the inner state of everyone's soul. But based on historical evidence, I'd guess yes. Human nature is the same, but human society and culture can be more or less Christian or conducive to holiness and virtue, and the state of Christian society has fluctuated through history. In the era of medieval Christendom, society openly proclaimed Christ as Lord, and encouraged devotion to the Catholic Faith. Public life centered around the Christian religion, as evidenced by the building of the magnificent cathedrals which were at the heart of society. Art and literature was often centered around Christian themes. Of course, there was plenty of sin and evil then too, and there never was a perfect golden age. I don't think 1509 was really a high point for the Church, though. Many Catholic historians consider the 13th century "the greatest of centuries," though it was far from perfect, and was followed by two centuries of religious decline and increased corruption in the Church, culminating in the Protestant Revolt of 1517. However, I think it very safe to say that, despite problems and abuses, people and society as a whole took the Faith much more seriously then than now. The contemporary era is arguably unique in society's promotion of immorality and vice as virtue, and in its condemnation of virtue, even among so-called "Christians." People committed sins in all past eras, yet these were not promoted as "rights" and being good in themselves, and people as a whole sought to avoid these vices. Today, society openly promotes every kind of perversion, and scorns and ridicules "traditional morality." Past ages may have been prone to hypocrisy, but hypocrisy is the tribute vice pays to virtue. Today, virtue is paid no tribute, much less practiced, and vice is extolled as virtuous. Anyone who thinks modern society is the best there's ever been is deluding himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincent Vega Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 [quote name='Socrates' date='22 December 2009 - 02:06 PM' timestamp='1261508786' post='2024501'] Past ages may have been prone to hypocrisy, but hypocrisy is the tribute vice pays to virtue. [/quote] Is this an original thought? It's spectacular. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winchester Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 [quote name='JimR-OCDS' date='22 December 2009 - 01:40 PM' timestamp='1261507256' post='2024485'] No people weren't more holy 500 years ago. They belonged to the Catholic Church mostly because they were forced to. It was economic suicide to be outside the Church, and when the King mandated what religion his country would follow, so did the people, without question. This is not holiness, but out of such harsh times, God brought forth, very holy people. Jim [/quote] Overly simplistic history. Too many commas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now