Jump to content
An Old School Catholic Message Board

The Novus Ordo Missae


OraProMe

  

40 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

[quote name='Socrates' date='14 December 2009 - 08:51 PM' timestamp='1260838298' post='2020726']
This contradicts your earlier claim that the TLM is just attended by "conformists" rather than "faith-filled people."


Yes, we can see how dumbing everything down has worked wonders.

If Catholics have really "spiritually evolved" so much over the past, this shouldn't be an issue.
[/quote]


Making the Mass understandable by allowing it in the language of the people, isn't dumbing it down, but instead, bringing people into fuller participation, which is exactly what Vatican II document on the Sacred Liturgy states.

As Father Michael G. Ryan stated in his article "What If We Said, 'Wait'?" on the changes to the liturgy stated;

[quote]
The council that gave to conferences of bishops the authority to produce their own translations ([i]S.C.[/i], Nos. 36, 40), to be approved, it is true, by the Holy See but not, presumably, to be initiated, nitpicked and controlled by it. Further, the council also wisely made provision for times of experimentation and evaluation ([i]S.C.[/i], No. 40)
[/quote]




If we look at the humble saints such as St Bernadette, who had little understanding of the Catholic Mass because she could barely understand French, never mind Latin. Do you think she would've loved the Mass in her own vernacular? FYI, French wasn't her vernacular.

Same is true for others.

If allowing the Mass in the vernacular is a dumbing down, then so is translating Scripture or any other text into the vernacular, a dumbing down process. We're all just too stupid to read the text in its original language, so why dumb it down. [img]http://www.phatmass.com/phorum/public/style_emoticons/default/saint.gif[/img]


Jim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='JimR-OCDS' date='15 December 2009 - 10:21 AM' timestamp='1260890476' post='2020925']
Making the Mass understandable by allowing it in the language of the people, isn't dumbing it down, but instead, bringing people into fuller participation, which is exactly what Vatican II document on the Sacred Liturgy states.

As Father Michael G. Ryan stated in his article "What If We Said, 'Wait'?" on the changes to the liturgy stated;






If we look at the humble saints such as St Bernadette, who had little understanding of the Catholic Mass because she could barely understand French, never mind Latin. Do you think she would've loved the Mass in her own vernacular? FYI, French wasn't her vernacular.

Same is true for others.

If allowing the Mass in the vernacular is a dumbing down, then so is translating Scripture or any other text into the vernacular, a dumbing down process. We're all just too stupid to read the text in its original language, so why dumb it down. [img]http://www.phatmass.com/phorum/public/style_emoticons/default/saint.gif[/img]


Jim
[/quote]

Action failed: You have reached your quota of positive votes for the day

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='JimR-OCDS' date='15 December 2009 - 10:21 AM' timestamp='1260890476' post='2020925']
As Father Michael G. Ryan stated in his article "What If We Said, 'Wait'?" on the changes to the liturgy stated;
[/quote]

You're referring to THAT article? :lol_pound:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Resurrexi' date='15 December 2009 - 03:24 PM' timestamp='1260912291' post='2021196']
You're referring to THAT article? :lol_pound:
[/quote]
I am intrigued and amused by your scorn. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Resurrexi' date='15 December 2009 - 05:24 PM' timestamp='1260912291' post='2021196']
You're referring to THAT article? [img]http://www.phatmass.com/phorum/public/style_emoticons/default/lol_pound.gif[/img]
[/quote]


And the point of the article I presented is flawed in what way, according to your superior knowledge? [img]http://www.phatmass.com/phorum/public/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif[/img]


Jim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Nihil Obstat' date='15 December 2009 - 02:40 PM' timestamp='1260913203' post='2021218']
I am intrigued and amused by your scorn. :)
[/quote]
[url="http://www.americamagazine.org/content/article.cfm?article_id=12045"]"What If We Said, 'Wait'?"[/url]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='JimR-OCDS' date='15 December 2009 - 04:40 PM' timestamp='1260913240' post='2021221']
And the point of the article I presented is flawed in what way, according to your superior knowledge? [img]http://www.phatmass.com/phorum/public/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif[/img]


Jim
[/quote]

It advocates keeping a translation that would have gotten an F if being graded by a high school Latin teacher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Resurrexi' date='15 December 2009 - 05:42 PM' timestamp='1260913360' post='2021224']
It advocates keeping a translation that would have gotten an F if being graded by a high school Latin teacher.
[/quote]


The point of the article I presented was that as Fr Ryan points out the parts of Sacrosanctum Concilium which he referenced, is that it gave the Bishops the authority to produce the translations for their conferences, and to allow time of experimentation to see what would work best.

Obviously, you merely blew it of because of who wrote it, not for its content.

Jim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='JimR-OCDS' date='15 December 2009 - 03:50 PM' timestamp='1260913855' post='2021240']
The point of the article I presented was that as Fr Ryan points out the parts of Sacrosanctum Concilium which he referenced, is that it gave the Bishops the authority to produce the translations for their conferences, and to allow time of experimentation to see what would work best.

Obviously, you merely blew it of because of who wrote it, not for its content.

Jim
[/quote]
I got through the first three paragraphs. It's a load of garbage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='JimR-OCDS' date='15 December 2009 - 04:50 PM' timestamp='1260913855' post='2021240']
The point of the article I presented was that as Fr Ryan points out the parts of Sacrosanctum Concilium which he referenced, is that it gave the Bishops the authority to produce the translations for their conferences, and to allow time of experimentation to see what would work best.

Obviously, you merely blew it of because of who wrote it, not for its content.

Jim
[/quote]

Ecclesiology fail.

"In virtue of his office, that is as Vicar of Christ and pastor of the whole Church, the Roman Pontiff has full, supreme and universal power over the Church. And he is always free to exercise this power." (Second Vatican Ecumenical Council, Lumen Gentium, 22)

That means he can take the authority to produce translation away from the bishops and give it to a Roman Congregation if he feels like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I made a thread on the state of the Catholic Church which revealed the majority of Roman Catholics are "upbeat" about it. Yet this thread shows the majority of people believe the Church promulgated something it was better off never doing... how could this be?

Edited by mortify
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='mortify' date='22 December 2009 - 11:36 PM' timestamp='1261543009' post='2024869']
I made a thread on the state of the Catholic Church which revealed the majority of Roman Catholics are "upbeat" about it. Yet this thread shows the majority of people believe the Church promulgated something it was better off never doing... how could this be?
[/quote]

Summorum Pontificum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Resurrexi' date='22 December 2009 - 11:39 PM' timestamp='1261543171' post='2024872']
Summorum Pontificum.
[/quote]

It was a positive move in that the Magisterium confirmed what traditional Catholics always knew, that the ancient form of liturgy was never abrogated, and that Catholics have a right to celebrate it. Things are far from being restored however, which should be the goal if you believe the novus ordo should have never been promulgated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='mortify' date='23 December 2009 - 12:26 AM' timestamp='1261545991' post='2024887']
Things are far from being restored however, which should be the goal if you believe the novus ordo should have never been promulgated.
[/quote]

It is my opinion and hope that the Benedictine liturgical renewal will soon drip down to the average parish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...